% of people told us that this article helped them. Research Gate is an academic platform where the world researchers are sharing their information fullest confident. InitialChatFriendsList can help you know who has viewed your profile on Facebook. The charts on this page show whohas viewed your profile. Is quantile regression a maximum likelihood method? However, there is a mismatch between the goal of the RG Score and use of the site in practice. I was searching for a paper online, and a ResearchGate page came up. It may come as no surprise that this strategy has since been adopted by many of ResearchGates competitors, including Academia.edu and Mendeley. If you received a notification saying that "someone has viewed your profile", it means that someone has searched for you on Truecaller, either using your number or your name. This article was co-authored by wikiHow staff writer, Jack Lloyd. 7. We then expanded the sample to include examples from two further groups of academics: 30 academics who have a RG Score and multiple publications; and a further 30 were added who have a RG Score, multiple publications, and have posted at least one question and answer. Facebook went through similar problems with privacy and has since improved. With these developments in mind, it becomes even more important for us bibliometrics researchers to inform our stakeholders (such as funding agencies and university administrators) about the problems with individual metrics. But I do find it very helpful for keeping up with the state-of-the-art in my area. By signing up you are agreeing to receive emails according to our privacy policy. Ryan Whalen looks atthe different ways that scientific content are related, and how these relationships could be explored further to improve measures of scientific impact. 8. , rather than a site for active interaction with others. But at one point I was spammed with emails from ResearchGate of former collaborators, with whom I published or did not publish, and it still goes on. Below is how to see who views your Facebook this way. For one, the distribution of citations within a journal is highly skewed; one study found that articles in the most cited half of articles in a journal were cited 10 times more often than articles in the least cited half. wikiHow is where trusted research and expert knowledge come together. We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. There are several pieces of profile information which could potentially contribute to the score; at the time of the analysis, these included impact points (calculated using impact factors of the journals an individual has published in), downloads, views, questions, answers, followers and following. Tips on how to promote your research and profile as a researcher. When not composing tech articles, you can find her bringing characters to life in her fictional stories, reading something intriguing, or spending time with her near and dear ones. But there are many good reasons why this is a bad practice. Of course, using ResearchGate in this way is only worth it if a large-ish proportion of researchers in your sub-fields are on the site. It aims at allowing you to find articles that cite your work, without randomly distinguishing them in "valueable citations" or not. It lures one in with an appeal to recognition of other authors who are friends or co-authors. Now I pretty much get no email from them. No, Facebook does not let anyone view how often someone has viewed their profile (not even on the iOS version). This is what they say on the matter: One way to make sure that your publications gain maximum exposure among your peers is by inviting your co-authors to join you on ResearchGate when you add publications to your profile. In addition to her doctoral research on academic social networking sites, she has also published research on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and semantic web technologies for education. Using analytic algorithms, big data and artificial intelligence , we will list the people who have viewed your profile. Share Improve this answer edited Sep 6, 2022 at 21:49 Melanie Shebel Note: Number, email, and addresses are not visible until you yourself approve their request to view your details. Were committed to providing the world with free how-to resources, and even $1 helps us in our mission. How can South African users access the PAIA Manual. Below is how to see who views your Facebook this way. The most plausible explanation is that ResearchGate adjusted the algorithm but without any hints as to why and how that has happened, it leaves the researcher guessing. According to ResearchGate, the score includes the research outcomes that you share on the platform, your interactions with other members, and the reputation of your peers (i.e., it takes into consideration publications, questions, answers, followers). To find out more about cookies and change your preferences, visit our, Series: Rapid Response Publishing in Covid Times, Subscribe to the Impact Blog via Email or RSS. Cite. Other users are then able to follow these profiles and are notified of any updates. Don't install any apps or browser extensions like this, even if they. In order to learn more about the composition of the RG Score, we tried to reverse engineer the score. Perhaps others can say more. It is still displayed in every profile and it is also used as an additional information in many of the sites features, e.g. data, slides) is definitely a step into the right direction, and the idea of considering interactions when thinking about academic reputation has some merit. You can deactivate notifications in settings->notifications. In default settings, ResearchGate sends between 4 and 10 emails per week, depending on the activity in your network. Other than quotes and umlaut, does " mean anything special? The JIF, however, was not introduced as a measure to evaluate individuals, but as a measure to guide libraries purchasing decisions of journals. that discourages the use of the Journal Impact Factor for the assessment of individual researchers has garnered more than 12,300 signees at the time of writing. Your profile contributions page shows a summary of your activities when you are on ResearchGate. Select the main dropdown menu (i.e., three lines in the top corner of the application). As the JIF is based on the mean number of citations, a single paper with a high number of citations can therefore, In addition, the correlation between JIF and individual citations to articles, has been steadily decreasing since the 1990s. - Find out about your secret admirers. @EnthusiasticStudent I don't think there's any point editing a heavily downvoted answer to include links to places such as Twitter and Facebook. With metrics becoming ubiquitous in research assessment, as evidenced in the recent HEFCE report The Metric Tide, we are poised to see the formulation of many more. I also promptly started to read his older publications which were great, so this was an added benefit. We then expanded the sample to include examples from two further groups of academics: 30 academics who have a RG Score and multiple publications; and a further 30 were added who have a RG Score, multiple publications, and have posted at least one question and answer. Without taking any acces of whatsapp it is showing who viewed our dp. Moreover, you can set your profile and tell other researchers what you are dealing with, what topics you are interested in, and so on. In September, they introduced a new metric named Reads. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered. Confirm authorship of. How have perceptions of ResearchGate changed from 2014 to 2018? ResearchGate has received substantial financial backing from venture capitalists and Bill Gates, but it is not clear how the platform will generate revenue; the possibility of the score being linked to financial value warrants further exploration and critical assessment. the idea behind the app is intreaguing & enticing ; not to mention it's beneficial in feeding a user's hunger to discover his/her secret peekers . In September, they. I will gladly use your example as a slide in my lecture on data-driven management. That in itself is not necessarily a bad thing. The high number of messages prove to be very successful for ResearchGate: according to a study by Nature from 2014, ResearchGate is the most well known social network among researchers; 35% of surveyed researchers say that they signed up for ResearchGate because they received an e-mail. The profile on ResearchGate shows an overview of the researcher's work: publications, professional expertise, institutions, contributions, and all the questions they have answered on the website. Also you should give summary of all those persons who have visited along with the date and time. Use it to try out great new products and services nationwide without paying full pricewine, food delivery, clothing and more. I think ResearchGate has huge potential and many benefits if used appropriately. Furthermore, the score misses any activities that takes place outside of ResearchGate; for example, Twitter is more frequently the site for actively discussing research, ResearchGate seems to have reacted to the criticisms surrounding the RG Score. ResearchGate is an international company, whose purpose is to enable scientists across the world to work together openly and collaboratively, regardless of borders or nationality. Alternatively, you can use the Ctrl+U keyboard shortcut to access the page source. Do the referees see the profile of authors? One of the most apparent issues of the RG Score is that it is in-transparent. How do I cancel my Premium subscription? recommendations. 3. (All these considerations also apply to Academia.edu, which has a much nicer - or not so evil- marketing strategy). It seems puzzling that a score that claims to be a new way to measure your scientific reputation would go down that way. 4. Review the top 10 to 20 results. Add your publications by clicking 'add publications'. What's the best way to share my presentation slides online? Finally, it should be pointed out that the RG Score is not the only bad metric out there. But even in disciplines that communicate in journals, there is a high variation in the average number of citations which is not accounted for in the JIF. And ReseachGate uses your name for the invitation, so he will get annoyed at you. The JIF, however, was not introduced as a measure to evaluate individuals, but as a measure to guide libraries purchasing decisions of journals. At first, I would also get a lot of emails from them: Weekly stats, "people are noticing your work", are you an author of this paper?". In your opinion, how does ResearchGate fit into all of this? In her research, she explores how digital traces humans leave behind on the Web can be exploited to model and shape the way people work, learn and interact. Learn more Are you curious about who's been viewing your Facebook profile? {"smallUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikihow.com\/images\/thumb\/8\/82\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-18.jpg\/v4-460px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-18.jpg","bigUrl":"\/images\/thumb\/8\/82\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-18.jpg\/aid2904241-v4-728px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-18.jpg","smallWidth":460,"smallHeight":345,"bigWidth":728,"bigHeight":546,"licensing":"